Return to Flight
1988 — Discovery Returns the Space Shuttle to Flight
15:37:00 UTC
On September 29, 1988, the three main engines of Space
Shuttle Discovery ignited at Kennedy Space Center. Seconds later, its
two solid rocket boosters came alive. At 15:37:00 UTC, Discovery lifted
away from Launch Pad 39B carrying five astronauts into orbit. The moment was
unlike any previous Shuttle launch. For 32 months, no Space Shuttle had
flown. On January 28, 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger had broken apart 73
seconds after liftoff, killing all seven members of the STS-51L crew: Francis
“Dick” Scobee, Michael Smith, Ellison Onizuka, Judith Resnik, Ronald McNair,
Gregory Jarvis, and Christa McAuliffe. The accident brought Shuttle operations
to an immediate halt. Investigators traced the physical cause of the disaster
to the failure of seals in a joint of the right solid rocket booster. Hot gases
escaped through the joint, eventually contributing to the catastrophic
destruction of the vehicle. But the investigation went beyond hardware. The
Presidential Commission examining the accident also identified serious problems
in decision-making, communication, and NASA's organizational culture. Returning
to flight therefore required more than replacing a defective component. NASA
redesigned the solid rocket booster field joints, made numerous modifications
to Shuttle hardware and procedures, strengthened safety oversight, and
reconsidered how risks were evaluated and communicated. Discovery itself
underwent more than 200 modifications before STS-26. The crew chosen to
make the return was deliberately experienced. Commander Frederick “Rick”
Hauck, pilot Richard Covey, and mission specialists John Lounge,
George “Pinky” Nelson, and David Hilmers had all flown in space before. They
became the first all-veteran American spaceflight crew since Apollo 11. Their
spacecraft also reflected lessons learned from Challenger. During launch and
landing, the astronauts wore newly introduced Launch and Entry Suits,
providing greater protection than the clothing worn by Shuttle crews
immediately before the accident. Discovery also carried equipment for a new
emergency escape system that could allow astronauts, under certain
circumstances, to leave a disabled orbiter during controlled gliding flight. But
first the spacecraft had to launch. More than a million spectators reportedly
gathered along Florida's Space Coast. After weather caused a delay of
approximately an hour and a half, the countdown resumed. Discovery rose from
the pad. About two minutes later came one of the flight's most closely watched
moments. The redesigned solid rocket boosters completed their burns normally
and separated. Discovery continued toward orbit. NASA's flight controllers,
engineers, astronauts, and spectators had just watched the Shuttle safely pass
the point at which Challenger had been lost. Approximately eight and a half
minutes after liftoff, Discovery's main engines shut down normally. About 40
minutes into the mission, the astronauts fired the Orbital Maneuvering System
engines to circularize their orbit. Hauck radioed Mission Control: “It's nice
to be in orbit.” STS-26 was intentionally conservative. Its principal objective
was to demonstrate that the redesigned Shuttle system could operate safely. But
the mission also had important work to do. Approximately six hours after
launch, the crew deployed TDRS-3, a Tracking and Data Relay Satellite. A
similar satellite had been lost aboard Challenger. The TDRS network allowed
spacecraft in low Earth orbit to communicate with Earth through satellites in
much higher geosynchronous orbits, greatly increasing the amount of each orbit
during which astronauts and spacecraft could remain in contact with ground
controllers. Discovery remained in space for four days. On October 3, it landed
safely at Edwards Air Force Base in California. The Shuttle program had
returned.
Why It Matters: STS-26 restored American human
spaceflight after the Challenger disaster, but its significance was greater
than simply resuming launches. The mission tested redesigned hardware and new
safety procedures developed after one of NASA's darkest moments. It demonstrated
that returning from catastrophe requires understanding not only what hardware
failed, but also the human and organizational systems that allowed failure to
occur.
Also on This Day
1962 — Alouette I Places Canada Among the Spacefaring
Nations
UTC launch time uncertain; approximately 05:30–07:06 UTC
in surviving official accounts
On September 29, 1962 UTC, a Thor-Agena rocket lifted off
from California carrying a small Canadian spacecraft named Alouette I. The
satellite marked Canada's arrival in the Space Age. Only the Soviet Union and
the United States had previously designed and built their own artificial Earth
satellites. Canada became the third nation to do so. Alouette I emerged from an
invitation NASA issued in 1958 for international participation in its new
satellite program. Canadian scientists John Chapman and Eldin Warren,
working at the Defence Research Telecommunications Establishment, proposed
building a satellite that could investigate the ionosphere from above. The
ionosphere is a region of Earth's upper atmosphere containing electrically
charged particles. It has enormous practical importance because it affects the
propagation of radio waves and therefore long-distance communications. Scientists
had studied the ionosphere from the ground by transmitting radio signals upward
and examining their reflections. Alouette would reverse the geometry. Orbiting
above much of the ionosphere, it could transmit radio signals downward and
investigate the structure of the region from the top. The challenge was
formidable. Canada had never built a satellite. Engineers incorporated
technologies that were still relatively new, including transistors, solar
cells, and ingenious deployable antennas. The spacecraft's long antennas were
designed to unroll after reaching orbit. Alouette I weighed approximately 145
kilograms and entered an orbit roughly 1,000 kilometers above Earth. It
worked extraordinarily well. The spacecraft had been designed for a lifetime of
about one year. Instead, it returned useful scientific data for more
than ten years and produced more than one million ionospheric images.
Its success led to further Canadian-American cooperation through the
International Satellites for Ionospheric Studies program, including Alouette
II, ISIS I, and ISIS II. It also helped establish Canadian expertise in
spacecraft engineering that would later contribute to communications
satellites, robotic systems such as the Canadarm, and Canada's
continuing role in international space exploration. The name itself was
distinctly Canadian. “Alouette”—French for meadowlark—evoked flight while also
acknowledging Canada's French-language heritage.
Why It Matters: Alouette I made Canada the first
country after the Soviet Union and United States to design and build its own
satellite. Its extraordinary ten-year scientific lifetime demonstrated that
important space science need not be confined to the two Cold War superpowers
and helped establish Canada as a significant participant in space research.
1977 — Salyut 6 Begins a New Era of Space-Station
Operations
Launch time not established
On September 29, 1977, the Soviet Union launched Salyut 6,
a space station whose design would fundamentally change how humans lived and
worked in orbit. Earlier Salyut stations had already demonstrated that crews
could occupy orbital laboratories for extended periods. But they had an
important limitation. A station with only one docking port could accommodate
only one Soyuz spacecraft at a time. Because the crew needed its Soyuz to
return home, another spacecraft could not easily dock while the resident crew
was aboard. Salyut 6 had two docking ports. That seemingly
straightforward change transformed space-station operations. A resident crew
could remain aboard with its Soyuz docked at one end while another vehicle
arrived at the other. Visiting crews could come aboard. Replacement spacecraft
could be delivered. Most importantly, uncrewed Progress cargo spacecraft
could bring food, water, equipment, scientific supplies, and propellant. For
the first time, an inhabited space station could be resupplied routinely
while its crew remained aboard. That capability made progressively longer
missions practical. Salyut 6 would host numerous Soviet and international
crews. Its cosmonauts repeatedly broke human-spaceflight endurance records,
eventually remaining aboard for missions lasting roughly six months. The
station also became an important venue for the Soviet Intercosmos
program, through which cosmonauts from several allied countries flew in space. The
operational model established aboard Salyut 6—resident crews, visiting crews,
multiple docking ports, cargo deliveries, orbital refueling, repairs, and
long-duration habitation—would be developed further aboard Salyut 7 and Mir. Today
those practices are routine aboard modern space stations.
Why It Matters: Salyut 6 helped transform a space
station from a laboratory visited for a single expedition into an orbital
facility capable of sustained operations. Its second docking port and Progress
resupply system established an operational model that ultimately led toward
continuously inhabited stations such as Mir and the International Space
Station.
2011 — China Launches Tiangong-1
13:16 UTC
On September 29, 2011, China launched Tiangong-1, an
experimental orbital laboratory that represented another major step in the
development of the country's human-spaceflight program. Its name meant “Heavenly
Palace.” Tiangong-1 was not a large permanently inhabited space station
comparable with Mir or the International Space Station. It was something more
transitional: a laboratory in which China could learn and demonstrate
technologies required to build such a station. One capability was particularly
important: rendezvous and docking. Reaching orbit is one challenge. Bringing
two spacecraft traveling thousands of meters per second around Earth into the
same orbit, guiding them toward one another, and joining them safely is
another. Without dependable rendezvous and docking, constructing a modular
space station is effectively impossible. Tiangong-1 provided the target. In
November 2011, the uncrewed Shenzhou 8 spacecraft successfully
rendezvoused and docked with it, demonstrating China's first orbital docking. Human
crews followed. Shenzhou 9 docked with Tiangong-1 in 2012, carrying
China's first woman in space, Liu Yang. Shenzhou 10 visited in
2013 for another crewed mission. The small laboratory thus served as a
technological bridge between China's early Shenzhou missions and its much more
ambitious plans for long-term human habitation in orbit. Those plans eventually
produced the modular Tiangong space station, assembled in orbit
beginning with the Tianhe core module in 2021.
Why It Matters: Tiangong-1 gave China practical
experience in rendezvous, docking, orbital habitation, and station operations.
It was an essential stepping-stone from independent crewed spaceflight toward
China's construction and operation of a permanently crewed modular space
station.
The Bigger Picture
September 29 tells a story about how spaceflight grows from
an extraordinary achievement into a sustainable capability. Alouette I
demonstrates that progression at the national level. In 1962, the ability to
build a satellite was still associated overwhelmingly with the two Cold War
superpowers. Canada demonstrated that another nation could design a
sophisticated scientific spacecraft, place it in orbit through international
cooperation, and produce important research for more than a decade. Salyut 6
addressed sustainability differently. Putting people aboard a space station was
no longer enough. If humans were truly going to remain in orbit, they needed a
way to receive supplies, replace equipment, welcome other crews, and keep the
station operating. Two docking ports helped make that possible. Tiangong-1
represents another nation climbing a similar technological ladder. China had
learned to launch astronauts. Then it learned to conduct a spacewalk. With
Tiangong-1, it began mastering rendezvous, docking, and orbital habitation—the
capabilities required to construct a larger station. And Discovery's return to
flight reminds us that maintaining a capability also means confronting what
happens when the system fails catastrophically. The Challenger disaster
demonstrated that technological maturity can never be assumed. Spaceflight
remains unforgiving. The lesson of STS-26 was therefore not simply: We can
fly again. The deeper question was: What have we changed because of what
happened? That question belongs not only to NASA but to the entire history
of exploration. Alouette I required Canada to develop capabilities it had never
possessed. Salyut 6 required engineers to rethink how a station could be
supported. Tiangong-1 required China to master techniques needed for a future
station. STS-26 required NASA to examine a system that had failed and determine
how—and whether—it could safely return to flight. September 29 therefore
illustrates that exploration does not advance through achievement alone. It
advances when institutions learn. Build → operate → discover weaknesses →
adapt → build something better. That cycle has carried spaceflight from
small experimental satellites to spacecraft that can operate for decades and
stations that can remain inhabited year after year.
At a Glance
1962 — Approximately 05:30–07:06 UTC; exact time
uncertain — Alouette I launches from California, making Canada the third
nation to design and build its own artificial Earth satellite.
1977 — Launch time not established — The Soviet Union
launches Salyut 6, whose two docking ports and ability to receive Progress
resupply spacecraft transform long-duration space-station operations.
1988 — 15:37:00 UTC — Space Shuttle Discovery
launches on STS-26, returning the Shuttle program to flight 32 months after the
Challenger disaster.
2011 — 13:16 UTC — China launches Tiangong-1, an
experimental orbital laboratory that will help establish rendezvous, docking,
and habitation capabilities needed for a future modular space station.